Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: security feature - login history #560

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: POLARDB_15_STABLE
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

manfuldrifter
Copy link

Show the user the last login information.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Feb 26, 2025

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Hi @manfuldrifter ~ Congratulations to your first PR to PolarDB. 🎉

Please make sure that your PR conforms the standard, and has passed all the checks.

We will review your PR as soon as possible.

@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Something wrong occuried during the checks of your commit 😟, please check the detail:

⚠️ stylecheck (anolis8) View more details

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added the ci/failure CI status is failure label Feb 26, 2025
@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Something wrong occuried during the checks of your commit 😟, please check the detail:

⚠️ stylecheck (anolis8) View more details

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/failure CI status is failure and removed ci/failure CI status is failure labels Feb 26, 2025
@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Feb 26, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Congratulations~ 🎉 Your commit has passed all the checks. Please wait for further manual review.

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/success CI status is success and removed ci/failure CI status is failure labels Feb 26, 2025
@yangsn6
Copy link

yangsn6 commented Mar 1, 2025

Hello, I want to write history login information asynchronously through a process, which existing process is better to use? Or a new process?

@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Mar 17, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Something wrong occuried during the checks of your commit 😟, please check the detail:

⚠️ regression (rocky9, precheck-main, off) View more details

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/failure CI status is failure and removed ci/success CI status is success labels Mar 17, 2025
@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Mar 18, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Congratulations~ 🎉 Your commit has passed all the checks. Please wait for further manual review.

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/success CI status is success and removed ci/failure CI status is failure labels Mar 18, 2025
@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Mar 20, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Congratulations~ 🎉 Your commit has passed all the checks. Please wait for further manual review.

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/success CI status is success and removed ci/success CI status is success labels Mar 20, 2025
Show the user the last login information.
@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Something wrong occuried during the checks of your commit 😟, please check the detail:

⚠️ regression (rocky8, precheck-main, off) View more details

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/failure CI status is failure and removed ci/success CI status is success labels Mar 27, 2025
@polardb-bot
Copy link

polardb-bot bot commented Mar 27, 2025

Hey @manfuldrifter :

Congratulations~ 🎉 Your commit has passed all the checks. Please wait for further manual review.

@polardb-bot polardb-bot bot added ci/success CI status is success and removed ci/failure CI status is failure labels Mar 27, 2025
@mrdrivingduck mrdrivingduck self-requested a review March 27, 2025 08:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci/success CI status is success
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants